Bibliografia

  1.  Boland VB, Quigley HA. Evaluation of a combined index of optic structure and function for glaucoma diagnosis. BMC Ophthalmology 2011; 11:6.
  2. Harwerth RS, Quigley HA. Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124(6):853-9.
  3. Sample PA, Medeiros FA, Racette L, Pascual JP, Boden C, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovation in glaucoma study. IOVS 2006; 47:3381-9.
  4. Verdon-Roe GM, Westcott MC, Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Garway-Heath DF. Exploitation of the psychophysics of a motion displacement hyperacuity stimulus. IOVS 2006; 47: 4847-55.
  5. Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. J Glaucoma 2009; 18(2): 165-71.
  6. Bengtson, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Ophthalmology 2006; 113:1092-7.
  7. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-n-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111(5):645-50.
  8. van der Schoot J, Reus NJ, Colen TP, Lemij HG. The ability of SWAP to predict conversion to Glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 30-4.
  9. Castelo-Branco M, Faria P, Forjaz V, Kosac LR, Azevedo H. Simultaneous comparision relative damage to chromatic pathways in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. IOVS 2004; 45: 499-505.
  10. Spry PG, Johnson CA, Mckendrick AM, Turpin A. Measurment error of visual fields tests in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87:107-12.
  11. Xiang Fan, Ling-Ling Wu, Zhi-Zhong Ma, Ge-Ge Xiao, Feng Liu. Usefulness of Frequency-Doubling Technology for Perimetrically Normal Eyes of Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients with Unilateral Field Loss BS. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1530–7.
  12. Racette L, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 FDT tests compared with SAP. IOVS 2008; 49: 954-60.
  13. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137:863–71.
  14. Kamantigue ME, Joson PJ, Chen PP. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry. J Glaucoma 2006; 15:35–9.
  15. Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Ichhpujani P, Gupta A. Correlation of FDP with RNFL and optic disc size in ocular hypertensives and glaucoma suspects. J Glaucoma 2011 Aug; 20(6): 366-70.
  16. Ornelas O, Rodrigues MI, Loureiro C, Sens P, Gonçalves C, Figueiredo A, Grillo MM. Risco de escotomas futuros na perimetria clássica baseado no FDT-Matrix. Oftalmologia 2011; 35:4, 335-40.
  17. Matsumoto C, Takada S, Okuyama S, et al. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006; 84:210-5.
  18. Faria PM, Silva F, Mateus C, Reis A, Castelo-Branco M. Local motion discrimination deficits in ocular hypertension. ARVO Abs Book, B 268; 2007: 81.
  19. Teesalu et al. B/Y Visual Field and RNFL in Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2077–81.
  20. Sakata LM, DeLeo´ n-Ortega J and Girkin CA. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2007b; 18(2): 115–21, Review.
  21. Ferrera A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM. Can frequency doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? J Glaucoma 2007; 16(4): 372–83.
  22. Pierre-Filho PT, Schimiti RB, de Vasconcellos JP, Costa VP. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individual. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006; 84(3): 345–50.
  23. Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Arthur SN, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Arch. Ophthalmol 2007a; 125(3): 340–5.
  24. Patel A, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Schuman JS. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry. Ophthalmology 2007; 114(3): 480–7.
  25. Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D and Caprioli J. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2007; 143(2): 263–71.
  26. Cheng E, et al. For which glaucoma suspects is it appropriate to initiate treatment? Ophthalmology. 2009 April; 116(4): 710–7.
Dezembro 2012